| UKPSF self-assessment | |
| Criteria
Areas of activity |
Please give 1-2 examples from your practice of how you can show evidence that you cover all the areas of activity |
| A1. Design and plan learning activities and/or programmes of study
|
From techniques learned within PGCAP foundation modules, I have begun to implement different learning activities to improve the teaching of the Case Based Learning Module (CBL). I have identified the need to include activities to promote student engagement. CBL has potential to move to a completely online module and has previously been taught in the traditional face to face lecture. To progress CBL to an online module, use of a discussion board on Learn where journals/articles for the session are made available at least a week in advance. A task/question would be set for students to blog about in preparation for the scheduled online discussion. Students would have a Virtual Classroom session (Collaborate) and would be required to participate in a discussion on their well informed and researched answers to the set task/question. This would allow students to share knowledge they have gained from their own research with their peers and tutors. |
| A2. Teach and/or support learning
|
I am directly involved in the delivery of lectures within a tutorial style setting for all modules within the BSc program.
I am also involved in teaching of clinical practical skills within a phantom head suite. This involves practical demonstrations of clinical techniques using overhead projections. Students are given feedback and support with their practical techniques on a one to one basis. Students are encouraged to record feedback to assist in the organisation of self-directed learning. I have arranged remedial theoretical and practical teaching for students who have resit examinations or have missed University due to ill health and other circumstances. |
| A3. Assess and give feedback to learners
|
I am a clinical supervisor for BSc Oral Health Sciences. This involves supervising students whilst they carry out assessments and treat members of the public. Students receive private face to face feedback and grading on their performance during the appointments on two criteria domains; professional conduct and clinical abilities. The feedback is given promptly after the appointment to allow the student to reflect on their strengths and weaknesses and establish a goal for future appointments. I focus the discussion on targets for improvement to aid student reflection.
I am an examiner for all written examinations, observed structured clinical examinations (OSCEs) and structured clinical operative tests (SCOT). I am also involved in the development of assessments such as OSCE stations and written questions on subjects I have been responsible for teaching. |
| A4. Develop effective learning environments and approaches to student support and guidance
|
Being a student on the PGCAP course has introduced me to several effective learning environments. For example; virtual classroom and discussion boards now implemented for teaching Cased Based Learning (CBL), as was demonstrated in Block 3 of foundations of academic practice.
I am collaborating with a colleague from the paediatric department to create a video resource for paediatric restorative module for Y2. This will involve recording demonstrations of restorative techniques that students can access in preparation for the practical skills tutorial. This will allow for more effective time management in the skills session with optimum time for students to practice and ask questions. My role as a personal tutor gives me an opportunity to develop effective approaches to student guidance and support. I developed a “crib sheet” for PT staff members within the program to facilitate PT meetings. |
| A5. Engage in continuing professional development in subjects/disciplines and their pedagogy, incorporating research, scholarship and the evaluation of professional practices
|
As mentioned in A4 participation in the PGCAP program is an opportunity for me to develop my own pedagogy. I have selected the optional course of “research your teaching” as I have no previous experience of research and I am actively seeking opportunities to help cement a career within academia.
I also regularly attend IAD courses that are relevant to my teaching on a variety of topics; top hat, adding humour to lectures and the learning and teaching conference 2018. CPD for discipline/professional role are achieved within the 5 yearly cycle as set by the GDC. I am supported by senior staff to achieve all aspects of professional discipline CPD via patient cases, study days and attendance at conferences and courses. |
| Core Knowledge | Please give 1-2 examples from your practice of how you can show evidence that you demonstrate all the areas of knowledge |
| K1. The subject material
|
I have had my teaching peer reviewed (POT) back in January 2018 as part of block 2/4 of FOAP. The POT was completed by a colleague from BSc Oral Health Sciences. There was no concern detailed within the feedback from the observer regarding my knowledge of the subject material delivered to students during the lecture.
As clinical educator I must maintain a registration with the GDC (General Dental Council) this involves specific CPD – 150 hours of verifiable (courses, conferences, etc.) within a 5-year cycle. As clinical educator it is crucial that I keep up to date with current evidence based dental techniques and changes in legislation. This ensures that subject materials delivered are in alignment with current updates in legislation. |
| K2. Appropriate methods for teaching, learning and assessing in the subject area and at the level of the academic programme
|
Due to the variety of topics taught within the discipline I utilise many methods to teach students. From traditional lectures, anatomy teaching using 3D visual presentation and clinical practical skills in a phantom head lab using video streaming demonstrations.
When setting questions for assessment I ensure content has been covered within the lectures and that questions have a relevance to “real life” practice, asking students to demonstrate their factual knowledge in response to patient variables. All examination questions are agreed and ratified by external examiners and colleagues to ensure they are appropriately set for academic level of the candidate. I arrange a revision session for all year groups (often the year group allocated is the same as the PT year group). This allows students to clarify any misunderstandings with the tutor in a face to face setting prior to examinations and is an opportunity for students to share learning and studying techniques. Reflective portfolio is a session I hold with a year group to discuss patient case management. Students bring details of cases they are currently treating on student clinics. As a group, the students share patient management techniques, communication strategies and research interesting medical or dental conditions that patients present with. In addition, students also develop their reflective skills, which they will be required to complete in their professional work post qualification. |
| K3. How students learn, both generally and within their subject/disciplinary area(s)
|
Alongside the revision sessions, I set mock examinations for Y1 written paper (Health and Disease) and Y2 (simulated case). Students find this beneficial as they can experience the examination process prior to the exam diet and test the efficacy of their studying with enough time to modify prior to the real exam.
Student staff liaison committee – is conducted once a semester and is an opportunity to review student feedback and discuss any issues and suggestions students to lecturer and vice versa. Students have a class representative to speak on their year groups behalf. I find the meetings are informative and students conduct themselves in a professional manner. When teaching the discipline, particularly clinical practice and skills, I teach concepts under the assumption that students are seeing the content for the first time. Students enrol on the BSc programme that have a dental background such as dental nursing (mature students) and others matriculate immediately after finishing school studies. The students with previous dental experience do not have an advantage over those who do not, as the teaching materials and clinical practice time allocation is the same regardless of background. Students are also given extra support wherever required, this is often requested from both groups of students. |
| K4. The use and value of appropriate learning technologies
|
Through PGCAP and attendance at IAD courses, I have been introduced to different learning technologies such as Top hat and virtual classroom. Through PGCAP blocks, I have started integrating discussion boards into my teaching. This academic year I have been working on CBL module. CBL will continue as an online module being taught via discussion boards and arranged virtual classroom sessions to improve student engagement. The introduction of technology into CBL will enrich teaching for students and will expose them to other learning and communication environments which are fundamental to their future career as a Dental Hygiene Therapist. It will also support students who have distance commutes for a one-hour tutorial, which can be effectively delivered in a virtual classroom environment.
This year the dental institute has a new state of the art dental surgery with video recording and streaming equipment installed. I can now record treatment being carried out on a patient streamed live to a seminar room next door or can record for future reference. This tool can be used for teaching student’s patient management, communication as well as clinical techniques where it is not feasible to have several students peering over a patient during treatment. There is potential for this facility to be used for assessment in the future. |
| K5. Methods for evaluating the effectiveness of teaching | Peer observation of teaching carried out as part of block 2/4 of PGCAP was an opportunity to have the effectiveness of my teaching evaluated by a colleague who also specialises in my subject area. It was an educational experience being observed which was echoed by my observer. In the post POT feedback discussion, there were techniques and ideas we shared with one another to help improve our teaching.
I value the feedback from students via evasys and the written midterm feedback. Midterm feedback is reviewed by the team and discussed with student representatives at our SSLC (student staff liaison committee) with future actions being trialled. Again, it is an opportunity for teaching techniques to be evaluated and effective strategies to be shared to improve the programme holistically for all students. |
| K6. The implications of quality assurance and quality enhancement for academic and professional practice with a particular focus on teaching
|
TPR (Teaching Performance Review), I was not present for the review meeting, but I have been actively involved in the implementation of some of the recommendations such as;
” The Review Team recommends that the Programme Team explores ways to facilitate broken appointment and gaps in clinical diaries created by patient non-attendance, for the further enhancement of student learning. [1.1.7]. When this situation has arisen, I have utilised the found teaching time to discuss recent lectures covered, give students scenarios such as medical emergencies or utilised the clinical skills room to practice techniques. There is also an opportunity for peer assisted learning and feedback, as students who have a failed appointment can observe their peers. It is an opportunity for students to share patient management techniques and give feedback in a professional and constructive manner, as would be expected of them as a clinician. National Student Survey, midterm feedback and my yearly appraisal via (SOAR) is an opportunity to reflect on QA. Recording comments from colleagues, students and external staff is another opportunity to address any areas of my teaching that can be enhanced by further training. |
| Criteria Professional Values | Please give 1-2 examples from your practice of how you can show evidence that you practice all of the values |
| V1. Respect individual learners and diverse learning communities | As an employee of UoE, I have completed my unconscious bias training module on LEARN and passed the module assessment. This gave me insight to the potential situations that may arise and how to avoid giving a biased response or opinion.
In my role as lecturer and PT, I strive to be an approachable member of staff and encourage students to make contact when they are struggling with a concept; academic or personal. It is important to support students in establishing good studying techniques early on in their academic career through discussion in class sessions and one-to-one in PT meetings. I encourage students to access support with their learning from the disability services. Students often do not realise there is support for a variety of difficulties. Diverse communities within student populations will present with diverse needs (from mental health conditions to visual impairments). I have elected to complete the accessible and inclusive learning module for PGCAP. I have selected this course as I can identify that I lack experience and activity for this UKPSF dimension. |
| V2. Promote participation in higher education and equality of opportunity for learners | Within Dentistry, clinic set up can be a challenge for left handed students and clinicians. As a lecturer, I attempt to arrange skills rooms and allocate students equal opportunity to use the left-handed resources and facilities. When demonstrating practical skills, I ensure that I demonstrate the skill both left and right handed.
With enrolment on accessible and inclusive learning PGCAP course, I hope to learn techniques which I can further implement to support BSc OHS. I am involved in the admissions process and the design of the MMIs (multiple mini interviews). Due to the vast number of applicants and only 10 spaces available, candidates are filtered down to around 70 interviews from the content in the UCAS application. MMI differs from the traditional panel interview, allowing candidates to demonstrate skills at several stations. This allows us to select candidates who demonstrate good communication skills, manual dexterity and traits that are desirable to the role of a dental hygiene therapist which can often be missed in a question-based panel interview. |
| V3. Use evidence-informed approaches and the outcomes from research, scholarship and continuing professional development | My regular attendance at CPD and conferences within the discipline keeps my teaching at the forefront of research and evidence based dentistry. I carefully select training and conferences for topics that will further my teaching of the discipline and broaden my understanding of updates in clinical techniques, materials and equipment available.
I have selected the “research your teaching” module for PGCAP. The summative assessment requires me to draw up a research idea. I plan to look at implementing peer feedback in patient clinic on a trial basis. I will require student input and will invite BSc students to participate in data collection for this. I have recently been approached to be a sub investigator for a clinical trial, this will be my first experience of the role. I plan to share my experience with colleagues and students, particularly final year students, to inspire them to consider research within their professional career. |
| V4. Acknowledge the wider context in which higher education operates recognising the implications for professional practice
|
As a lecturer for BSc, I will continue to teach in accordance with GDC standards and will maintain my own professional development and registration as well.
I will continue to represent the University of Edinburgh at the Directors and Tutor group meetings. The group is formed of all school for teaching of DCPs (dental care professionals) in the UK. It is an opportunity to share pedagogy and discuss techniques and ideas for teaching and assessment.
|
TPR report OHS 2015 – https://www.ed.ac.uk/files/atoms/files//ohstprreportfinal.pdf