{"id":88,"date":"2018-03-29T15:13:09","date_gmt":"2018-03-29T14:13:09","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.pgcap.ed.ac.uk\/wp\/s0903104\/?p=88"},"modified":"2019-01-28T13:35:35","modified_gmt":"2019-01-28T13:35:35","slug":"reflective-response-to-peer-observation-of-teaching","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.pgcap.ed.ac.uk\/wp\/s0903104\/2018\/03\/29\/reflective-response-to-peer-observation-of-teaching\/","title":{"rendered":"Reflective response to Peer Observation of Teaching"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><span style=\"font-family: arial black,sans-serif;font-size: 12pt\"><a href=\"http:\/\/www.pgcap.ed.ac.uk\/wp\/s0903104\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/81\/2018\/03\/Lucy-Sheerins-Observation-Feedback-Form.pdf\">Lucy Sheerins Observation Feedback Form<\/a><\/span><\/p>\n<p>Peer Observation of teaching (POT) is;<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;A reciprocal process whereby one peer observes another&#8217;s teaching and provides supportive and constructive feedback.&#8221; (Cairns, Bissell and Bovill, 2013)<\/p>\n<p>My initial experience of POT was a positive one. When the assignment was first issued, I felt nervous about being observed and critiqued during my teaching. My reaction is parallel to the response found by Cairns, Bissell and Bovill (2013);<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;All participants admitted some trepidation before being observed and some actually described this as &#8220;anxiety&#8221;, but in all cases apprehension disappeared as they fell into their regular teaching role.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>This was also reflected in my observers\u2019 comments during the face-to-face discussion; she was empathic to the vulnerability I experienced, as the candidate being reviewed.<\/p>\n<p>In my selection process for the reviewer, I was fortunate to have several members that met the criteria. My observer (ZC) is a colleague who has been in post for over five years and has previously completed PGCAP. I invited ZC to be my observer as she is a colleague with a similar clinical background and has notable experience within academia, currently working towards her PhD.<\/p>\n<p>The lecture selected for the review was delivered to undergraduate year one BSc Oral Health Science candidates on clinical patient presentations. The aim of the lecture was to;<\/p>\n<p>\u201cIntroduce the students to the layout and protocol for conducting a patient history. Give the students a template for laying out their presentation to the clinical supervisor, which they are open to interpret and share ideas with the class. Conduct a role play situation where the students can practice conducting a patient history recording and presenting to a clinical supervisor.\u201d (Quoted from pre-observation form)<\/p>\n<p>I selected this lecture as it provided an opportunity to promote student interaction within a lecture and would aid student engagement. The lecture is meaningful and of great value to the students as they are often apprehensive at the prospect of treating patients for the first time. The subject material is detailed within slides, to which students can refer when preparing to attend clinics for the first time.<\/p>\n<p>I sought to create a role-play scenario in which students were able to utilise the information delivered in the lecture and the clinical presentation. I created a dummy patient and issued the students with a completed medical history and relevant clinical and dental information. The concept of role-play may have been more beneficial had I had allocated more time within the lecture for students to team up and practice the scenario. I chose to request volunteers to demonstrate to the whole class but this lead to me having to select a student to participate as there were no willing volunteers.<\/p>\n<p>Within the feedback from ZC she discussed the integration of videos or other media to aid student engagement. I am in complete agreement that there is significant potential for media to be introduced into the lecture. During the post observation discussion with ZC, we brainstormed ideas including a pre lecture video with examples of excellent patient presentations and presentations that were less successful. This would allow the student attending the lecture to gain prior knowledge of the process. In addition, students may be more willing to participate in role-play scenarios having viewed a video demonstrating good practice and thus know more of what is expected. The video could be designed in the style of a hazard perception test, where students would identify positive and negative aspects of the consultation and share their feedback and opinions on an online discussion board prior to the lecture.<\/p>\n<p>In the pre-observation form, I mentioned my concerns over pace and time management. I often feel my lectures are completed more quickly than delivered by my peers, however my observer didn\u2019t find any concerns in this area. In the weeks since the POT, I have reflected upon this concern and feel it may be due to a variety of factors;<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li>Students arrive with limited prior knowledge of the subject area and so the lecture becomes an information overload. Less confident students may they feel overwhelmed and not secure enough to engage in discussion or ask questions processed the subject information. Setting a small pre-task such as a question or study text would help the students to prepare more effectively and alleviate this. The lecture time will then be used to cover areas that have not previously dealt with in the task. \u00a0Effective lecture preparation will enhance the students\u2019 comprehension of material covered in the lecture and thus build their confidence when asking questions and engaging in discussion. Depth and discussion within lectures should therefore increase, thus pace of the session will be dictated by the student\u2019s demonstration of understanding.<\/li>\n<li>Having too many lengthy slides was mentioned within my POT feedback. The subject I chose for my observed teaching contained a large amount of important information to be taught and I felt that the students required all content to be detailed within the slides. This allows students to refer to the process and content at any point during preparation for clinics. However, I do firmly agree that moving away from text heavy slides is important, not only in terms of lecture pace but in engagement as well. Students have the capacity to record lectures electronically as in addition to taking notes; therefore if all content is not detailed on the slides it may encourage the student to engage more actively in the lecture. This may not directly impact on the pace however, through improvement in student engagement, the pace again will be dictated by the learners\u2019 needs.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p>Post completion of the POT, I have been gradually trialling the introduction of different techniques to help students engage more fully in their lectures. Case Based Learning module (CBL) involves studying current and relevant literature or patient cases. The first part of the CBL session involves the students reading the paper or case, which is then followed by a discussion on the topic. This previous arrangement had a similar result, to the POT lecture, regarding limited student participation. I accept that this is due to the students having minimal time to digest the CBL materials, before having to present an opinion or solution to the task\/topic. \u00a0I have adapted the format by publishing the papers for the review via an online discussion board and inviting students to share their views on the subject prior to the lecture. Students are encouraged to comment on one another\u2019s blog posts and I also gave individual feedback. When students arrived for the CBL session, an open debate regarding the subject was held. Students were keen to initiate discussions and didn&#8217;t require the usual cajoling to contribute their ideas. I shared the idea with members of the teaching and they have reported achieving positive experiences with other year groups when adopting this approach. Our lecturing team are now planning to make CBL an entirely online module with the introduction of virtual classroom, optimising student and staff time and resources.<\/p>\n<p>Overall, POT has increased my confidence in my lecturing abilities and continues to inspire me to \u00a0develop my teaching techniques and create better learning environments.<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-family: tahoma, arial, helvetica, sans-serif;font-size: 10pt\"><strong>References<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-family: tahoma, arial, helvetica, sans-serif;font-size: 10pt\">CAIRNS, A., BISSELL, V., &amp; BOVILL, C. (2013) <span class=\"ng-binding ng-scope\">Evaluation of a pilot peer observation of teaching scheme for chair-side tutors at Glasgow University Dental School. <\/span><span class=\"ng-binding ng-scope\"><em>British Dental Journal. <\/em>214, 573-576. Available online:\u00a0http:\/\/www.nature.com.ezproxy.is.ed.ac.uk\/articles\/sj.bdj.2013.527 Accessed: Feb 2018<\/span><strong><span class=\"ng-binding ng-scope\"><br \/>\n<\/span><\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Lucy Sheerins Observation Feedback Form Peer Observation of teaching (POT) is; &#8220;A reciprocal process whereby one peer observes another&#8217;s teaching and provides supportive and constructive feedback.&#8221; (Cairns, Bissell and Bovill, 2013) My initial experience of POT was a positive one. When the assignment was first issued, I felt nervous about being observed and critiqued during &hellip; <a href=\"https:\/\/www.pgcap.ed.ac.uk\/wp\/s0903104\/2018\/03\/29\/reflective-response-to-peer-observation-of-teaching\/\" class=\"more-link\">Continue reading <span class=\"screen-reader-text\">Reflective response to Peer Observation of Teaching<\/span> <span class=\"meta-nav\">&rarr;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":75,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-88","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-uncategorised"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.pgcap.ed.ac.uk\/wp\/s0903104\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/88","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.pgcap.ed.ac.uk\/wp\/s0903104\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.pgcap.ed.ac.uk\/wp\/s0903104\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.pgcap.ed.ac.uk\/wp\/s0903104\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/75"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.pgcap.ed.ac.uk\/wp\/s0903104\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=88"}],"version-history":[{"count":18,"href":"https:\/\/www.pgcap.ed.ac.uk\/wp\/s0903104\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/88\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":257,"href":"https:\/\/www.pgcap.ed.ac.uk\/wp\/s0903104\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/88\/revisions\/257"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.pgcap.ed.ac.uk\/wp\/s0903104\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=88"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.pgcap.ed.ac.uk\/wp\/s0903104\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=88"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.pgcap.ed.ac.uk\/wp\/s0903104\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=88"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}